by industry

Construction

Daily logs. Schedules. Change orders. Drone footage. Procore messages. Construction generates data built for project execution, not disputes. When disputes hit, that data has to become evidence. Lineal handles the translation, across CAD, BIM, project platforms, and chat.

Talk to an Expert

Built for the Way Construction
Actually Generates Data

Construction projects produce structured project data, unstructured technical drawings, and communications across systems never designed to talk to each other. We bring the workflow that turns all of that into defensible evidence.

  • average reduction in review volume across construction matters through AI-driven workflows and structured project data culling.

  • documents processed across construction matters using the Amplify™ Suite of Tools, spanning email, SharePoint, and project file collections.

  • in client savings delivered across construction litigation and arbitration portfolios.

A Discovery Model Built
for Construction’s Data Reality

Construction generates data across project management platforms, design files, financial systems, and communications.
Each source requires specific handling. Each phase of the project tells a different part of the dispute story. Our framework
treats the project lifecycle, not the document set, as the unit of investigation.

  • STEP 1

    Engage and Scope

    Construction discovery starts with the data ecosystem, not the custodian list.

    • Map project management platforms in use including Procore, Aconex, PlanGrid, BIM 360, and Autodesk Construction Cloud
    • Align with the contractual framework (FIDIC, JCT, NEC, AIA, or owner-specific) and the claim and notice provisions in play
    • Identify CAD, BIM, and design file repositories across the project team
    • Catalog mobile devices, site cameras, and drone-captured visual evidence
    • Map communication channels including project email, Teams, WhatsApp, and platform messaging

    Result:

    A complete project data inventory with sources, custodians, and stakeholders mapped.

  • STEP 2

    Forensic Preservation and Collection

    Project data lives in places generic eDiscovery doesn’t reach.

    • Forensic collection from Procore, Aconex, PlanGrid, BIM 360, and Autodesk Construction Cloud
    • Native CAD and BIM file extraction with metadata and version history preserved
    • Mobile device collections including site photos, drone footage, and SMS coordination
    • Project email and team communications collected across M365 and Google Workspace
    • Chat reconstruction from WhatsApp, Teams, and platform-native messaging

    Result:

    High-integrity construction data ready for analysis and review.

  • STEP 3

    AI-Driven Data Analysis

    The evidence story lives in the data structure, not just the documents.

    • Amplify™ and Relativity aiR accelerate review across schedules, communications, CAD files, financial records, and project imagery, surfacing evidence faster than manual document review
    • Image and video deduplication across project photos and drone footage with metadata extraction
    • CAD and BIM file processing with version comparison and design change tracking
    • Timeline reconstruction from communications, schedules, and change orders
    • Cost overrun analysis through structured financial document review

    Result:

    Pattern detection across multi-party communications for coordination evidence.

  • STEP 4

    Defensible Output and Reporting

    From data to evidence, ready for arbitration, litigation, or settlement.

    • Timeline visualizations showing schedule slip, change orders, and communications in correlation
    • Communication maps across the project team with role and timing attribution
    • Cost overrun reconstructions with source documentation and rationale
    • Defect timelines with CAD version history and inspection report alignment
    • Production sets formatted for arbitration tribunals and both common law and civil law courts

    Result:

    Construction evidence ready for the tribunal, court, or settlement table.

Why Lineal

Construction Discovery Built for the Data, Not the Documents

Construction discovery fails when teams retrofit workflows for project data. Lineal designs the workflow around how construction generates evidence and integrates with existing platforms.

  • eDiscovery Provider

    Built for Construction’s Data Sources

    Lineal integrates with Procore, Aconex, PlanGrid, BIM 360, and Autodesk Construction Cloud. Native CAD and BIM processing, image and video deduplication, and chat reconstruction across project messaging built in.

  • eDiscovery Provider

    Built for the Long Tail

    Common law markets carry warranty and statute of repose periods running 10+ years. Civil law markets carry decennial liability, with strict ten-year liability for structural defects. Lineal designs preservation programs to survive that timeline.

  • eDiscovery Provider

    Connected to Forensic Accounting and Quantum

    Construction discovery feeds quantum and damages analysis. We extract structured data from financial systems, change orders, and schedules in formats forensic accountants can analyze directly.

  • eDiscovery Provider

    Built for International Construction Arbitration

    Cross-border matters require local privacy compliance with centralized strategy. Lineal operates across SIAC, ICC, AAA, JAMS, DIAC, and ad-hoc tribunals with regional teams aligned to each matter.

Technology in Action

Built for Construction’s Data Stack,
Not Generic eDiscovery

Generic eDiscovery wasn’t built for construction. Our operations integrate with construction’s actual data
stack and handle the file types those platforms produce.

  • Digital Forensics Company

    Amplify™ Suite of Tools + Relativity

    Lineal’s proprietary engine for legal data in Relativity. Amplify™ handles construction’s mixed data: project communications, technical drawings, financial documents, and structured project data.

  • Digital Forensics Service

    Project Platform Integration

    Direct collection from Procore, Aconex, PlanGrid, BIM 360, and Autodesk Construction Cloud. Native CAD and BIM file extraction with metadata, version history, and design change tracking preserved.

  • Digital Forensics

    Visual Evidence Processing

    Site photos, drone footage, and project video deduplicated at scale. Geolocation, timestamp, and metadata extraction across image and video formats. Object detection when it advances the case.

  • eDiscovery Services

    ChatCraft for Construction Communications

    WhatsApp groups for site teams. Teams chats with subcontractors. Procore messaging. ChatCraft reconstructs construction conversations across major platforms with full context preserved.

CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES WE HANDLE

Built for Every Major Type of
Construction Dispute

From delay claims to multi-jurisdictional arbitration, our framework supports
the full range of construction matters where data is the case.

  • Delay Claims and Schedule Disputes

    Timeline reconstruction across schedules, communications, and change orders. Critical path analysis backed by source data, project team chat reconstruction, and FIDIC Clause 20 notice compliance.

  • Construction Defect Investigations

    CAD and BIM version history aligned with inspection reports and quality documentation. Discovery surfaces whether defects originated in design, construction, or materials.

  • Cost Overrun Disputes

    Structured financial data extraction across change orders, invoices, and payment applications. Discovery output formatted for forensic accounting and quantum analysis.

  • Multi-Party Contract Disputes

    Discovery across general contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, designers, and owners. Communication mapping with role and timing attribution clarifies the contractual story.

  • International Construction Arbitration

    Cross-border discovery aligned to SIAC, ICC, AAA, JAMS, DIAC, and ad-hoc tribunals. Regional data infrastructure and centralized strategy with local privacy compliance built in.

  • Regulatory and Safety Investigations

    OSHA, EPA, and other regulatory matters supported by structured data review of safety reports, environmental documentation, and incident communications.

Industry & Role Applications

Built for Teams That Live in
Construction Disputes

Designed for in-house construction legal, outside counsel, and international
arbitration practitioners.

  • In-House Construction & Infrastructure Legal

    GC offices at large contractors, EPC firms, and infrastructure developers. Repeatable workflow that scales across projects, with methodology that survives the lifecycle.

  • Outside Construction Counsel

    Construction litigation and arbitration support with documented methodology, declaration-ready output, and clear ownership boundaries between firm and discovery operator.

  • International Construction Arbitration Counsel

    SIAC, ICC, AAA, JAMS, DIAC, and ad-hoc tribunal support with regional data infrastructure, in-region preservation, and centralized investigative strategy.

REGIONAL CAPABILITY

Operating Across Construction’s
Major Markets

Construction disputes operate within local frameworks. Contracts, arbitration forums, and data
residency rules differ by region. Lineal operates with regional expertise built into the workflow.

  • North America

    AIA contracts and US construction litigation. AAA and JAMS arbitration support. Production formats for US federal and state courts.

  • UK and Europe

    JCT and NEC contracts, TCC matters, English High Court procedure. Civil law jurisdictions and cross-border European arbitration.

  • UAE and Gulf

    FIDIC contracts, DIAC arbitration, and ten-year decennial liability under Article 880. DIFC court support.

  • APAC

    FIDIC contracts, SIAC and HKIAC arbitration, and in-region data residency. Multi-jurisdictional support across construction markets.

Case Studies

  • eDiscovery Vendor

    Industry: Corporate

    Accelerating Multi-Jurisdiction Competition Audit Review

    Read the Case Study

    Challenge:

    Seven countries. Nine languages. 8.6 million documents. A competition law audit that traditional review could not finish in time.

    Outcome:

    Audit completed on time. Out of 8.6 million documents loaded, only 87,000 required human review. Defensible, regulator-ready results across every jurisdiction.

    • 8.6M

      Documents loaded across seven countries and nine languages.

    • ~87K

      Documents actually reviewed. A fraction of the total population.

    • 7 Countries, 9 Languages

      Consistent, defensible relevance determinations across every jurisdiction.

    Read the Case Study
  • RelativityOne eDiscover Provider

    Industry: Pharmaceutical

    Defensible Scope Reduction in High-Stakes Pharmaceutical IP Litigation

    Read the Case Study

    Challenge:

    A Fortune 100 pharmaceutical company needed to review a large, complex document population under litigation pressure. Traditional first-pass review models would have been too slow, too expensive, and too inconsistent.

    Outcome:

    Lineal eliminated first-pass review entirely. Over 95% of the document population was reduced before a human reviewer saw a single document. Full defensibility maintained.

    • 95%+

      Review volume reduced before human review began.

    • 70%

      Additional reduction post-Amplify™ through AI-assisted relevance assessment.

    • 100%

      Defensible decisions with documented, SME-governed coding logic.

    Read the Case Study
  • eDiscovery Service

    Industry: Financial services, Investigations

    Anti-Money Laundering Investigation for a Global Bank

    Read the Case Study

    Challenge:

    A major global bank faced an AML investigation requiring review of 12+ million documents under a strict 3-month deadline. High-risk data patterns needed precise identification, and the cost of a traditional review approach was not an option.

    Outcome:

    Lineal reduced review volume by 97%. Fewer than 3% of documents required manual assessment. Deadline met, defensible results delivered, fixed fee.

    • 97%

      Review volume reduced with less than 3% of documents touched by human reviewers.

    • 12M+

      Documents processed using AI-powered categorization and clustering.

    • 3 Months

      Regulatory deadline met with no delays.

    Read the Case Study
  • Industry: Law Firms

    Document Review in Criminal Investigation

    Read the Case Study

    Challenge:

    52,795 FBI-provided documents for the Andrade criminal investigation. A status conference deadline. The case team needed to move beyond linear review and organize the full universe by concept.

    Outcome:

    Amplify™ tools covered 98% of the document universe. Textual Near Duplicate Identification handled 68%. Lineal Images addressed the remaining 30% of image file types. Deadline met.

    • 52,795

      FBI-provided documents reviewed for the status conference.

    • 68%

      Document universe addressed by Textual Near Duplicate Identification.

    • 30%

      Image file types addressed by Lineal Images classification.

    Read the Case Study
  • eDiscovery Provider

    Industry: Law Firms

    Efficient Data Management for a Complex Legal Dispute

    Read the Case Study

    Challenge:

    3 million documents from 140+ custodians, transferred from a previous vendor. The data needed to be verified for completeness, then the legal team needed a fast path to the evidence that mattered.

    Outcome:

    The full Amplify™ Suite of Tools cut through the volume. Email threading, BotDetector, PrivFinder, Snippets, and Lineal Images each took a layer off until the legal team had a clear path to relevant evidence.

    • 3M

      Documents processed from 140+ custodians.

    • 641,098

      Documents reduced through email threading alone.

    • 731,681

      Documents ring-fenced for targeted privilege review with PrivFinder.

    Read the Case Study

Recognized for
Excellence and
Innovation

  • “Regulators gave us 90 days and 12 million documents. Lineal’s team reduced the review population by 97% and met the deadline without a single extension request. That kind of precision under pressure is why they handle our most sensitive matters.”

    General Counsel, Top 10 Global Bank

  • “We eliminated first-pass review entirely on our largest IP matter. Over 95% of the population was reduced before a reviewer touched a single document, and every decision was defensible. That changed how our entire legal department thinks about review.”

    VP of Legal Operations, Fortune 100 Pharmaceutical Company

  • “We used to send every large matter to an outside vendor. Now we handle it internally with Lineal’s team and technology sitting behind our operation. Our partners see it as a value-add for clients, and it has become a meaningful revenue line for the firm.”

    Managing Partner, Am Law 100 Firm

  • “Our previous provider treated RelativityOne like a hosting platform. Lineal treated it like the foundation of our entire legal operations strategy. The migration took two weeks. The transformation of how our teams use the platform is still compounding a year later.”

    Head of Litigation Technology, Am Law 100 Firm

  • “We had cycled through two providers in three years. Lineal was the first partner that embedded into our operations instead of just processing our data. We now have real-time visibility into spend, predictable timelines, and a legal ops function our board takes seriously.”

    Chief Legal Officer, Fortune 20 Corporation

  • Lineal has become an essential extension of our litigation team. Their expertise, responsiveness, and technology-driven approach consistently elevate the quality and efficiency of our matters.

    Partner, Am Law 50 Firm

Resources & Insights

Explore more
  • From Projects to Operations: The Evolution of eDiscovery Managed Services

    Why eDiscovery is shifting from project-based engagements to continuous operations, and what that means for cost predictability, defensibility, and AI.

    • AI & Analytics

    • Managed Services

  • AI-Native Business Will Change the Evidence Landscape

    What ACC Legal Operations and CLOC 2026 made clear: as businesses go AI-native, the evidence landscape changes. Marco Nasca on what comes next.

    • AI & Analytics

    • Investigations

  • Modern Attachments in eDiscovery: What Your Collection Strategy Is Probably Missing

    Modern attachments in Microsoft 365 aren’t traditional attachments. See how the version, linking, and case law gaps reshape eDiscovery collection strategy.

    • Digital Forensics

    • Document Review

Explore more